Annotated Bibliography Essay Example for Free

Annotated Bibliography EssayIn this report, Hanna Rosin argues that increasing taxes on junk foods may encourage people to purchase healthy fruits and vegetables instead of high-fat, sugary snacks. tally to Rosin, researchers have conducted experiments that tested whether people would choose low-priced healthy foods over regular-priced junk foods in vending machines and in high schools. In each experiment, she contends, gross revenue of low-calorie snacks, fruits, and vegetables increased, and sales of unhealthy foods decreased.These experiments, in the authors opinion, suggest that increasing the cost of junk foods may promote healthy food choices. Schlosser, Eric. Fast forage Nation The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. New York Houghton Mifflin, 2001. According to Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation (2001), the fast-food industry took root alongside that interstate highway system, as a new form of restaurant sprang up beside the off-ramps. Fast food operators esta blished restaurants in strategic places, targeting busy intersections and commercial hubs.Schlosser said that McDonalds, the largest fast-food chain in the world, is in f phone number one of the worlds largest buyers of satellite photography, using it to predict the direction of suburban sprawl. With the apparent ubiquitousness and the intense advertising schemes, Schlosser and early(a) critics have feared that fast food does not only capitalize to attract us in spending our hard-earned money to buy their products, but they also act irresponsibly in failing to adequately inform consumers of the health risks involved in eating fast food. play a trick on, M. K. , Hamilton, W. and Lin, B. H.(2004).Effects of Food Assistance and Nutrition Programs on Health and Nutrition vol. 3, Literature Review, Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report no. 19-3. Washington U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. In this report, Fox et al. (2004) revealed that the U. S. Congr ess has recently allowed after-school programs in seven statesDelaware, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, New York, Oregon, and Pennsylvaniato serve suppers as well as snacks to children in areas where much than 50 percent of the children check for free or reduced-price school meals.With this program, some low-income children may eat three meals and a snack every weekday during the school year from federal food programsa particular that highlights both the growing importance of the federal child nutrition programs for children in low-income families and the need to ensure that the foods these programs serve are consistent with the recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Graham, hustle and Kingsley, Sarah Williams. New Study Finds That Food is the Top Product Seen Advertised by Children Among All Children, Tweens See the Most Food Ads at More than 20 a Day. Kaiser Family Foundation.28 Mar 2007. 06 Nov 2007. http//www. kff. org/entmedia/entmedia032807nr. cfm. This ne ws report revealed that childhood obesity is related to food advertising target children. Policymakers in Congress, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and agencies such as the Institute of Medicine (IOM) have clamored to have necessary changes in the advertising unhealthy foods. In the report entitled Food for Thought idiot box Food Advertising to Children in the United States, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) found that tweens ages 8-12 see the most food ads on TV, an average of 21 ads a day, or more than 7,600 a year.Teenagers see slightly fewer ads, at 17 a day, for a total of more than 6,000 a year. Of all food ads in the weigh that target children or teens, 34% are for candy and snacks, 28% are for cereal, and 10% are for fast foods. Four percent are for dairy products and 1% for fruit juices. Alarmingly, of all the 8,854 ads reviewed in their study, there were none for fruits or vegetables targeting children or teens. Schlafly, Phyllis. Fat Kids Whos Responsible? Eaglefo rum, 17 Sept 2003. 06 Nov 2007.http//www. eagleforum.org/column/2003/sept03/03-09-17. shtml. This position by Phyllis Schlafly declared that public schools must take a big share of responsibility for the current epidemic of childhood obesity. Schlafly maintained that rather than impart to childhood obesity by providing easy access to junk foods and sodas, schools must take action to reduce it. In her opinion, schools exert a powerful enamor over what children eat and the amount of time they spend exercising, and could thus be a powerful force in fighting obesity.